eprintid: 2220
rev_number: 7
eprint_status: archive
userid: 6
dir: disk0/00/00/22/20
datestamp: 2014-06-30 13:00:57
lastmod: 2014-06-30 13:00:57
status_changed: 2014-06-30 13:00:57
type: monograph
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Saltari, Enrico
creators_name: Ticchi, Davide
creators_id: 
creators_id: davide.ticchi@imtlucca.it
title: Can risk aversion really explain the negative investment-uncertainty relationship?
ispublished: unpub
subjects: HB
divisions: EIC
full_text_status: none
monograph_type: working_paper
keywords: JEL Classification: D81, D92, E22
abstract: This paper shows the role of risk aversion and intertemporal substitutability in the investment-uncertainty relationship. Using recursive preferences, the paper demonstrates that not only the degree of risk aversion is important in determining the sign of the investmentuncertainty relationship but that the intertemporal substitution elasticity also plays a crucial role. This cannot be captured in the traditional expected utility set-up as risk aversion and intertemporal substitutability are determined by the same parameter. In particular, the paper shows that risk aversion can explain the negative relationship between investment and uncertainty only in a static context. In a dynamic framework, the linkage between periods can lead risk aversion to have a positive e¤ect on investment when uncertainty increases. Indeed, the e¤ects deriving from the linkage between periods depend by the intertemporal substitution elasticity: under low intertemporal substitutability, greater risk aversion can lead to higher investment when uncertainty increases. Moreover, the paper shows that with CRRA preferences investment should be positively correlated with the degree of uncertainty for reasonable values of the coe¢cient of relative risk
aversion
date: 2000
date_type: published
number:  
pages: 25
institution: IMT Institute for Advanced Studies Lucca
citation:   Saltari, Enrico and Ticchi, Davide  Can risk aversion really explain the negative investment-uncertainty relationship?  Working Paper  # /2000        (Unpublished)