eprintid: 3116 rev_number: 6 eprint_status: archive userid: 72 dir: disk0/00/00/31/16 datestamp: 2016-02-25 15:59:28 lastmod: 2016-02-25 15:59:28 status_changed: 2016-02-25 15:59:28 type: article metadata_visibility: show creators_name: Vecchi, Tomaso creators_name: Cattaneo, Zaira creators_name: Monegato, Maura creators_name: Pece, Alfredo creators_name: Cornoldi, Cesare creators_name: Pietrini, Pietro creators_id: creators_id: creators_id: creators_id: creators_id: creators_id: pietro.pietrini@imtlucca.it title: Why cyclops could not compete with Ulysses : monocular vision and mental images ispublished: pub subjects: RC0321 divisions: CSA full_text_status: none abstract: The present research demonstrates that the limitations of congenitally blind people in tasks requiring the processing of mental images are specifically related to the absence of binocular vision and not to the absence of vision per se. We contrasted three different groups of participants: sighted; visually impaired, with reduced binocular vision; monocular, with a normal visual acuity although in one eye only. Visually impaired participants (i.e. blurred vision) show a pattern of performance comparable to that of the sighted. In contrast, monocular participants show a similar pattern of performance to congenitally blind individuals despite being able to see perfectly well. These results shed new light on the relationship between perception and imagery and on the characteristics of sequential and simultaneous processes in the human brain. date: 2006-05-15 publication: Neuroreport volume: 17 number: 7 publisher: Wolters Kluver pagerange: 723-726 id_number: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000215773.46108.ae refereed: TRUE issn: 0959-4965 official_url: http://journals.lww.com/neuroreport/pages/articleviewer.aspx?year=2006&issue=05150&article=00007&type=abstract citation: Vecchi, Tomaso and Cattaneo, Zaira and Monegato, Maura and Pece, Alfredo and Cornoldi, Cesare and Pietrini, Pietro Why cyclops could not compete with Ulysses : monocular vision and mental images. Neuroreport, 17 (7). pp. 723-726. ISSN 0959-4965 (2006)