Chiou, Jing-Yuan The Patent Quality Control Process: Can We Afford An (Rationally) Ignorant Patent Office? Working Paper (Unpublished)
|
PDF
- Draft Version
Download (358kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper considers patent granting as a two-tiered process, which consists of patent office examination (public enforcement) and court challenges (private enforcement). It argues that, when the patent-holder has private information about the patent validity, (i) a weak patent is more likely to be settled and thus escape court challenges than a strong patent; and (ii) when the economy suffers from the low patent quality problem, a tighter examination by the patent office may strengthen private scrutiny over a weak patent. Both work against Lemley (2001)’s hypothesis of a “rationally ignorant” patent office.
Item Type: | Working Paper (Working Paper) |
---|---|
Additional Information: | JEL codes: K40, O31, O34 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Case Selection, Patent Quality, Public and Private Enforcement of Law. |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory K Law > K Law (General) |
Research Area: | Economics and Institutional Change |
Depositing User: | Users 15 not found. |
Date Deposited: | 25 Feb 2011 09:18 |
Last Modified: | 11 Jul 2011 14:00 |
URI: | http://eprints.imtlucca.it/id/eprint/99 |
Actions (login required)
Edit Item |